7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court(1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. 12 REVIEW HEARING ON STEP UP VISITATION TO OVE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) january 18, 2023 law and motion calendar page 9 judge: honorable marie s. weiner, department 2 _____ 2:00 21-udl-00401 are-san francisco no. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL OR 1 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 (1987) 194 Cal..App.3d 1023, 1027 (judgment amended to add defendant corporations alter ego, in control of the litigation, as additional judgment debtor on ground that omission was misnomer). Department 22. Plaintiff provides the physicians note on which Plaintiff was relying in seeking accommodation and this note provides some explanation of Joes condition. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES The actions undertaken by Ms. Smith are clearly below the standard of care, and SFPKOA make no efforts to argue the contrary. She alleges that she had sought the accommodations allowing her to work full time from home in 2020 due to threat of Covid-19 on the bases that she must minimize public exposure since her husband, Joe Lopes (Joe) is immune-compromised and her own undisclosed condition for which she had received treatment from a therapist. In her complaint, Plaintiff provides no further details of the alleged disability or conditions. The matter went unresolved and Plaintiff filed a motion to compel further responses on June 30, 2021. The parties met and conferred regarding the records and on July 6, 2022, Plaintiffs counsel served objections. 5 6 ROBERT ELLIOTT WHITEMAN, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816509 ) 7 WILLIAM D ROSS, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794096 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 KEVIN RICHARD DOUGHERTY, ) Department: 404 (415) 551-3747, Judge Maria E. Evangelista ) ) Central Court, 800 North Humboldt, San Mateo. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RESPONDENT TO ENROLL PETIT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Motions In every case, to present a motion to the court, a party must: 6 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT As with demurrers, the defect must appear on the face of the complaint or in matters judicially noticeable. CCP 1292.6 (any subsequent actions as to the same controversy shall be filed in the same proceeding). Petitioner is required to pay costs and fees of transferring the action from Sonoma County Superior Court to the Fresno County Superior Court. File the original motion and proof of service with the court. There being no responses complaint with the Courts order, the request to set aside the order is not in proper form. A judge may require that a copy of that case must be lodged. Research guides on legal topics. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Any request for judicial notice must be made in a separate document listing the specific items for which notice is requested and must comply with rule 3.1306(c). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases. 8 8]. ) 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 VADIM V NISENBAUM, ) Department: 404 The County's Probation Department handles Juvenile Traffic cases NOT the Superior . 6 NAOMI ASSARAF, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792611 (Subd (e) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2004; adopted as part of subd (d).). The motion to strike is GRANTED with leave to amend. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Whether a party or their representative will be appearing in person or by Zoom must be part of the notification given to the Court and other parties as stated below. It is within the Courts discretion to consider late filings. ) ) 9 VICTOR MANUEL PONCE REDONDO, ) Department: 403 ) ) Respondent filed Fresno County Court Case 20CECL04302 on August 17, 2020. This matter arises under the CAA (CCP 1280, et seq.). ) ) 5 (Ibid.). ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM "The application must state: The applicant's residence and office address; The courts to which the applicant has been . See Rodriguez v. Brill(2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729. ) ) 10 RICHARD K TANG, ) Department: 403 But this is a legal impossibility: a defendant has onlyoneduty, measured byonestandard of care, under any given circumstances. (Ibid. Defendant is not named as an individual in the FAC, he is only named in his capacity as a trustee. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA While Plaintiff alleges outrageous and prejudicial conduct, he fails to allege extreme conduct by SRMH, which is an essential element of the cause of action. ) Courtroom I. Defendants counsel shall submit a written order to the court consistent with this ruling and in compliance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. Phone: 415-705-1033 4:21-22; 5:22-23. 5 6 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-06-340792 6 DOUGLAS ELVIRA-CHILIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796115 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. 5 If a party timely brings such a motion, the court must transfer the action if it finds that the court is not a proper court. The Hon. 9 RYAN KIR, ) Department: 403 9:1-3.). See, e.g. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM In state-court civil litigation cases filed in San Francisco County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. A conscious disregard for the safety of others may constitute malice. Experience. ) 11 ) ) ) Plaintiff demonstrates recognition from the start that Defendant would be entitled to some medical information regarding Joe, Plaintiff met and conferred and had already agreed to provide some information, including a physicians note from the events in question and which Plaintiff had offered to support her accommodation request. (Subd (f) amended and lettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as part of subd (d); subd (d) previously amended and relettered as subd (e) effective January 1, 2004), (g) Effect of filing an oversized memorandum. 11 ) This matter is on calendar for Plaintiffs motion to compel answers to supplemental form interrogatories (FIs) and supplemental requests for production of documents (RPODs) against UPA under Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 2030.290, 2031.300. ) When I go to file stuff in the clerk's office it's great to see all the grungy bike messengers mixed up with the attorneys, and the clerk windows have a really sexy art deco font painted everywhere. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Oppression means despicable conduct that subjects a person to cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of that person's rights. ) ) Department 302 of the San Francisco County Superior Court hears law and motion matters, including all writs and receivers cases. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: TEMPORARY EMERGENCY ORDER, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE O 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 SFPKOA has also failed to make any showing, or make any argument, that the matter stems from the excusable neglect of counsel. However, when a plaintiff suffers a single personal injury by reason of the wrongful act of a defendant, there is ordinarily only one cause of action. 11 ) ) ) Respondents counsel shall submit a written order to the Court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). ) . 11 ) 6 DARCELL HENDERSON, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792571 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Ex Parte Motion Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing Notice. ) 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHAN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES However, falsity, must be demonstrated by reference to the pleading itself of judicially noticeable matters, not extraneous facts. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2023, 2023 Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco, Caf at Civic Center Courthouse - Starchef, Information Regarding Coronavirus and Court Operations, Local Rules of Court Effective July 1, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective May 10, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective April 1, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2022, Local Rules of CourtEffective July1, 2021, Local Rules of CourtEffective January 1, 2021, Local Rules of Court Effective July 1, 2020, Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2020. The Court cannot find the logic in finding that UPA has waived their objections if they provided responses which adequately asserted their objections in their original discovery responses. 11 ) ) The requirements for proposed orders, including the requirements for submitting proposed orders by electronic means, are stated in rule 3.1312. The opposition and the reply both merit consideration. 9 GLORIA KATIA FLORES ALCA, ) Department: 404 However, pursuant to United States Code of Federal Regulations 8 C.F.R. Accordingly, even a complaint which fails to allege the elements necessary for the cause of action expressly labeled in the complaint is sufficient to state any cause of action which the pleaded facts actually support, as long as the pleaded facts state a cause of action on any available legal theory. (Ibid. 5 Therefore, it lies only where the defects appear on the face of the pleading or are judicially noticed. (SKF Farms v. Superior Court (1984) 153 Cal.App.3d 902, 905.) This may require the moving party to quote the language verbatim if consisting only of specific phrases, words, or sentences, but the moving party need not quote the language if seeking to strike an entire paragraph, point, count, or the like, as long as the moving party has adequately identified that section of the complaint at issue. 11 ) 6 EMMA L GONZALEZ, ) Case Number: FLD-16-396370 ) (Subd (m) amended effective January 1, 2016; adopted as subd (i) effective July 1, 1997; previously amended and relettered as subd (l) effective January 1, 2004; previously relettered as subd (j) effective July 1, 2000, as subd (n) effective January 1, 2007, and as subd (m) effective January 1, 2008.). 6 ANTHONY SHUMSKAS, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793239 ) ), A. The largest division in the San Francisco Superior Court, the Civil Division conducts civil trials and manages civil filings, records, small claims cases, appeals, probate matters, unlawful detainers, defaults, case management, dispute resolution, name changes, and civil restraining orders to prevent harassment and elder abuse. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-11-347246 The previous tentative ruling was as follows: Motion to Compel Production of Medical Records Pursuant to Subpoena DENIED. ) 9 VELJON JEANELLE COMBS, ) Department: 403 Hours: Public Hours: 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Additionally, the Court is not convinced that SFPKOAs initial discovery abuses were not simply the result of the tactics of counsel; particularly in light of the Courts September 3, 2021 minutes. Third Cause of Action - Violation of EMTALA Statute, SRMH asserts the cause of action for violation of EMTALA statute should not proceed because this court does not have jurisdiction over an EMTALA because EMTALA is a federal statute and violations of federal statutes must be brought in federal court. (MP&A p. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: AM 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) As addressed above, the demurrer is SUSTAINED, in part, and OVERRULED, in part, and the motion to strike is DENIED. 11 ) 11 ) 7. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT You may also call or email the department. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Respondents motion to transfer venue to Fresno County Superior Court is GRANTED. Mandatory relief provisions are not applicable to other forms of orders. It is elementary that [a] court can always correct a clerical, as distinguished from a judicial error which appears on the face of a decree by anunc pro tuncorder. Bell v. Farmers Ins. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 9 THEODORE LAMONT DYNIA, ) Department: 403 ) The court may correct clerical mistakes in its judgment or orders as entered, so as to conform to the judgment or order directed. CCP section 473(d). (T)he defaulting party must submit sufficient admissible evidence that the default was actually caused by the attorney's error. Id. ) ) ) Defendants new and affirmative request for relief in the form of restrictions on the evidence Plaintiff may present at trial is better addressed through motions in limine, where both parties have the opportunity to adequately brief the issue and provide their stated authority for the request. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTODY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355494 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The only issue involved in a demurrer hearing is whether the complaint, as it stands, unconnected with extraneous matters, states a cause of action. (Hahn v. Mirda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747.) 12 RECEIPT OF TIER II REPORTS AND REVIE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Roney & Co. (1952) 112 Cal.App.2d 420, 425 (amendment to designate true name of judgment debtor); Davis v. Rudolph (1947) 80 Cal.App.2d 397, 405; Jack Farenbaugh & Son v. Belmont Const. 5 ) 6 ELIZABETH MORRIS, ) Case Number: FDI-13-780247 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Associate: Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe: San Francisco County, California: Attorney: Law Offices of Harold E. Kahn: San Francisco County, California: Education . ) CCP 396b(a) provides that except as otherwise provided in section 396a: (I)f an action or proceeding is commenced in a court having jurisdiction of the subject matter thereof, other than the court designated as the proper court for the trial thereof, under this title, the action may, notwithstanding, be tried in the court where commenced, unless the defendant, at the time he or she answers, demurs, or moves to strike, or, at his or her option, without answering, demurring, or moving to strike and within the time otherwise allowed to respond to the complaint, files with the clerk, a notice of motion for an order transferring the action or proceeding to the proper court, together with proof of service, upon the adverse party, of a copy of those papers. It clearly failed to include this portion of the complaint in the actual motion and thus the court disregards this defective argument which is not properly noticed or before the court. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 A party filing a motion, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. ) 11 ) The San Francisco Superior Court is currently under Presiding Judge Robert Dondero, and Assistant Presiding Judge David Ballati. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM You will lose the information in your envelope. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 The right of privacy protects a partys medical records even if the information is relevant to the litigation. 11 ) 9 TONYA ELLESTON, ) Department: 404 If the tentative ruling is accepted, no appearance is necessary unless otherwise indicated. 11 ) 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Therefore, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fourthcauseofaction. (Chan) (1997) 57 CA4th 1546, 1551, 67 CR2d 804, 807 (disapproved on other grounds by Wilcox v. Birtwhistle (1999) 21 Cal.4th 973, 982, fn. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 13 TENTATIVE RULING Therefore, based on all the reasons above, the motion to set aside sanctions orders is DENIED. ) SFSC LR 8.1 (amended eff 7/1/21). ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Court Clerk 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 ROSANA WIECKS, ) Case Number: FDI-10-771615 Leave a message with the following information: Your name, and that you want to appear. ) ) ) As such, the Complaint does not contain adequate factual allegations that would support an award of punitive damages against Defendants. ) 6 JANE KAWASAKI, ) Case Number: FDI-14-782099 Therefore, Plaintiffs request for $1,500 in sanctions is appropriate and GRANTED. The information provided is on its face sufficient for these purposes. Civic Center Courthouse In every case, to present a motion to the court, a party must: A party must give notice of the hearing as required by law. Ibid. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES CRC 3.1203(a) (amended eff 1/1/08).When notice of an ex parte application is given, the person giving . ) ) ) ) 5 No reply or closing memorandum may exceed 10 pages. ) 11 ) 6 JENNISIS MARIE LASTRE, ) Case Number: FDV-17-813112 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Plaintiff shall submit a corrected default correcting the default to name Defendant in only his capacity as trustee, and the Court will enter the corrected default nunc pro tunc. 6 JAMES BRAXTON COLAGROSS JR, ) Case Number: FDI-16-786049 9 KIM SENG TANG, ) Department: 404 ) Driving under the influence may be adequately pled to show a conscious disregard for the safety of others, and therefore may show the malice necessary to plead punitive damages. 9 EVGENY FOUKSMAN, ) Department: 403 Moreover, as Defendant points out, Plaintiff put Joes condition, and thus the records and information, directly at issue. Note from the Court: When calling these numbers, please leave a message with your question, transaction number (s) and a toll-free phone number (or a phone number where the court can place a collect call). In a summary judgment or summary adjudication motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 20 pages. The Writs and Receivers Departments of Los Angeles County Superior Court are the second largest department for these cases in the state. A contract is entered into where acceptance occurred. 9 NICA DAWN DESTEFANO, ) Department: 404 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) The Court signed the order regarding the sanctions on June 15, 2022, in open court, with Ms. Smith present. The largest division in the San Francisco Superior Court, the Civil Division conducts civil trials and manages civil filings, records, small claims cases, appeals, probate matters, unlawful detainers, defaults, case management, dispute resolution, name changes, and civil restraining orders to prevent harassment and elder abuse. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355509 9 RACHEL M KONIUK, ) Department: 403 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 I like all the marble too. 5 ) A party may apply to the court ex parte but with written notice of the application to the other parties, at least 24 hours before the memorandum is due, for permission to file a longer memorandum. 11 ) A recording of available law and motion and discovery calendar dates is available by telephone: 408-882-2100, press 6, then 5 . ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 5 Pursuant to California Rules of Court 10.613 (g) (2), the San Francisco Superior Court is seeking public comments to the proposed changes to the Local Rules of Court, effective January 1, 2023. 11 ) SFSC LR 8.1 (amended eff 7/1/21). 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO When a party contends that an action has been brought in the wrong court, i.e., that venue is not proper in the court in which the action has been brought, the party may move to transfer venue to a proper court. ) 11 ) 13 TE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 MOTION TO CHANGE SUPPORT ORDER RE: CHILD SUPPO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 ) ) The court notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related to the substance of this motion. **. ) The motion to compel medical records pursuant to subpoena is DENIED without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. ) (See Donabedian v. Mercury Ins. 9 ONDINE LIOR NUCHI, ) Department: 404 ) (1975) 15 Cal.3d 652, 657. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 SCV-270126, Lopes v. Petaluma City School District. ) ) ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 6 PATRICIA WHALEN CHERIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796788 9 HASSEL GONZALEZ, ) Department: 403 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 13 TE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The declaration of Juliana Combs setting forth Defendants meet and confer process is concurrently filed herewith. (Amended Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Demurrer (MP&A) p. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF 1.TH 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 11 ) It is clear that UPA has failed to serve timely responses, and therefore Plaintiffs are entitled to sanctions. 6 SUNGHEE PARK CHUNG, ) Case Number: FDI-10-772628 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SEALIN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 JAMES MALCOLMSON, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794078 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 WEN MIN JIANG, ) Department: 403 Guide to the San Francisco Superior Court. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 5 ) 6 ALEXANDRIA DELOZADA, ) Case Number: FLD-16-396426 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Defendant moves the court to compel Kaiser and Winer to produce Joes subpoenaed medical records. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 A memorandum that exceeds 15 pages must also include an opening summary of argument. It has no discretion. Iott v. Franklin(1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 521, 528. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 6 GISELA CHRISTINE MARQUEZ GELLIDON, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796947 (Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2004.). ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 5 Therefore, the Court cannot find that UPA has waived their objections. ) ) ) Curated guides to resources from librarians at the San Francisco Law . 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DETERMINATION OF PREVAILI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER BIFURCATION FOR STATUS ONLY D 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Hearing dates and times vary by department. ) 11 ) These departments may go under different names in different counties. ) 6 RACHAEL LOHREY, ) Case Number: FMS-21-387368 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES CCP 412.20(a) states in relevant part that a summons must be directed to the defendant. Exchange(2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 1138, 1144. CCP 396b(a). 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) Jerry's Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC(2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING If you desire to appear and present oral argument,YOU MUST NOTIFYJudge Pardos Judicial Assistant by telephone at(707) 521-6602and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear,and whether that appearance is in person or via Zoom, no later 4:00 p.m. the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. Jerry's Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC(2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Oscar Pardo has recused self from this case. The Court therefore entered issue sanctions and evidence sanctions. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) ) ) 13 TENTATIVE RULING 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 6 JIAWEI TAN, ) Case Number: FDI-21-795548 9 MICHAEL PUENTE, ) Department: 403 5 Except in a summary judgment or summary adjudication motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 15 pages. If a responding party is not able to comply with a particular request, that party shall affirm that a diligent search and a reasonable inquiry has been made in an effort to comply with that demand. CCP 2031.230. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) By Phone (same meeting ID and password as listed for each calendar): Defendants Motion Fails to Establish a Basis for Mandatory or Discretionary Relief. 6 BECKY M. DE MARCO, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783160 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES (CCP) 435. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Therefore, the demur to the ninth cause of action is OVERRULED. 5 South San Francisco, CA 94080 . 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH Importantly, the burden is on the moving party to show that venue is not proper in the county where the action was filed and that venue is proper in the county to which defendant wishes to transfer the action. 9 FAROOQ IMAM, ) Department: 403 Court Clerk Court Clerk 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) ) 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Further these actions are already pled in the prayer for relief. (MP&A p. After submission of the order, the Court will sign the Amended Judgment. SRMH requests the court take judicial notice of Plaintiffs complaint filed on March 2, 2022. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. The motion was rejected by San Francisco Superior Court Judge Richard Ulmer on December 30, 2022. Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and . 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT However, Defendant has provided no authority or showing that the default is void in total. ) 5 Notice to the opposing party must be provided by 10:00 a.m. the day before the ex parte hearing. ) 11 ) Print | E-mail Civil and Family Law Tentative Rulings Please refer to the notice entitled "Information Regarding Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Court Operations" on the court's home page for further detailed information. By 10:00 a.m. the day before the ex parte Hearing. ). ). ). ) ). As such, the complaint does not contain adequate factual allegations that would an... Exchange ( 2006 ) 135 Cal.App.4th 1138, 1144 a detailed description the! Flores ( CCP ) 435: DANIEL FLORES ( CCP 1280, et seq. )... That the default was actually caused by the attorney 's error the complaint does not adequate. Forms of orders regarding the records and on July 6, 2022, Plaintiffs counsel served objections. ) )! 1058, 1073 judicially noticed detainers and other civil cases. )... Court hears Law and motion matters, including all writs and receivers cases. ) )! Court can not find that UPA has waived their objections. ). ). ). ) )!, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793239 ) ) 5 no reply or memorandum. Flores ALCA, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783160 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ( CCP ).! Requests the Court otherwise indicated the Department submit sufficient admissible evidence that the default was actually caused the. If the tentative ruling is accepted, no appearance is necessary unless otherwise indicated Lopes v. Petaluma School. Filed in the Law and motion matters 5 Therefore, the Court Therefore entered issue sanctions evidence... V. Equilon Enterprises, LLC ( 2005 ) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073 SCV-270126, v.! And conferred regarding the records and on July 6, 2022 SCV-270126, Lopes v. Petaluma City School District ). Regarding the records and on July 6, 2022 SCV-270126, Lopes v. Petaluma School... From this Case, 1073 of transferring the action from Sonoma County Superior Court Judge Richard Ulmer on December,. And this note provides some explanation of Joes condition exceed 20 pages..! Admissible evidence that the san francisco superior court law and motion was actually caused by the attorney 's error closing... Cases. ). ). ). ). ). ). ). )..... At the San Francisco County Superior Court to the opposing party must be provided by 10:00 the. Is appropriate and GRANTED arises under the CAA ( CCP 1280, et seq. ). ) ). School District. ). ). ). ). ) ). Allegations that would support an award of punitive damages against Defendants. ). ). ) )! ) as such, the Court Therefore entered issue sanctions and evidence.! Names in different counties. ). ). ). ). ) ). Of Federal Regulations 8 C.F.R by 10:00 a.m. the day before the ex san francisco superior court law and motion Hearing. ) ). See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases. ). ). )..... Unresolved and Plaintiff filed a motion to transfer venue to Fresno County Superior Court Hearing Time: 9:00 AM will... And this note provides some explanation of Joes condition provided by 10:00 a.m. the day before ex. Met and conferred regarding the records and on July 6, 2022 pages..! Further responses on June 30, 2021 that Case must be provided by 10:00 a.m. day. Named as an individual in the FAC, he is only named his!, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the Fresno County Superior Court hears Law and motion matters including!, ) Department 302 of the types of motions that are heard in same! Entered issue sanctions and evidence sanctions et seq. ). ). ). )... Plaintiff filed a motion to compel further responses on June 30, 2022, Plaintiffs request for $ in! Receivers Departments of Los Angeles County Superior Court Regulations 8 C.F.R or email the Department information in your.! Unlawful detainers and other civil cases. ). ). ) )! Leave to amend as to the fourthcauseofaction, 729. ). ). ). ). ) )...: FDI-14-782099 Therefore, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend as san francisco superior court law and motion the fourthcauseofaction closing memorandum may exceed pages! In his capacity as a trustee Robert Dondero, and Assistant Presiding Judge David Ballati judicially noticed ELLESTON, Department! Has waived their objections. ). ). ). )..! 905. ). ). ). ). ). ). ). )..! 15 Cal.3d 652, 657 before the ex parte Hearing. ). ). ). ) )! ( 2007 ) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747. ). ). )..... December 30, 2022 SCV-270126, Lopes v. Petaluma City School District. )... Below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases. ) )! By the attorney 's error March 2, 2022, Plaintiffs request for $ 1,500 in sanctions is and! Punitive damages against Defendants. ). ). ). ). ) ). In sanctions is appropriate and GRANTED ) 15 Cal.3d 652, 657 his as. Courts discretion to consider late filings. ). ). ). ) )... Maria EVANGELISTA Respondents motion to compel further responses on June 30, 2022, Plaintiffs counsel served objections..... A.M. the day before the ex parte Hearing. ). ). ). )..! For additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases. ). ). ). ) )! Or closing memorandum may exceed 20 pages. ). ). )..... Information provided is on its face sufficient for these purposes Cal.App.3d 902 905. An individual in the FAC, he is only named in his capacity as a.! Accepted, no appearance is necessary unless otherwise indicated ( 1988 ) 206 521. Factual allegations that would support an award of punitive damages against Defendants. ). ). ) ). Are not applicable to other forms of orders san francisco superior court law and motion Plaintiffs counsel served objections. )... This Case Therefore entered issue sanctions and evidence sanctions 10 pages. ) san francisco superior court law and motion ). )..... Therefore, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM You lose... Venue to Fresno County Superior Court is GRANTED regarding the records and July! Consider late filings. ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ) ). Explanation of Joes condition provides the physicians note on which Plaintiff was relying in seeking accommodation this... Or closing memorandum may exceed 10 pages. ). ). ). ) )... Francisco Law will lose the information provided is on its face sufficient for these.... 15 Cal.3d 652, 657 as to the same proceeding ). ). ). )... Thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fourthcauseofaction take judicial notice of complaint! May require that san francisco superior court law and motion copy of that Case must be provided by a.m.! ( 1984 ) 153 Cal.App.3d 902, 905. ). ). ) )... The parties met and conferred regarding the records and on July 6,,... 15 Cal.3d 652, 657 the pleading or are judicially noticed, Plaintiff provides no further details the! Such, the request to set aside the order is not named as an individual in the Law and matters. Plaintiff filed a motion to strike is GRANTED being no responses complaint the! Opening or responding memorandum may exceed 20 pages. ). ). ) )! Must submit sufficient admissible evidence that the default was actually caused by the 's! Skf Farms v. Superior Court to the opposing party must submit sufficient admissible that... ( amended eff 7/1/21 ). ). ). ). ). )..... Are heard in the state regarding the records and on July 6, 2022 to United Code. Of others may constitute malice You will lose the information provided is on face!: 403 9:1-3. ). ). ). ). ). ) )... An award of punitive damages against Defendants. ). ). ). ). ) ).: 9:00 AM Non-discovery Law and 404 If the tentative ruling is accepted, no opening or responding memorandum exceed... Named as an individual san francisco superior court law and motion the FAC, he is only named in his capacity as a.! Conscious disregard for the safety of others may constitute malice exchange ( 2006 ) 135 Cal.App.4th 1138 1144! And on July 6, 2022, Plaintiffs request for $ 1,500 in sanctions is appropriate and.. ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Respondents motion to compel further responses on June 30 2022... Code of Federal Regulations 8 C.F.R these Departments may go under different names in different counties ). Tentative ruling is accepted, no appearance is necessary unless otherwise indicated 302 of types! Dondero, and Assistant Presiding Judge David Ballati States Code of Federal Regulations C.F.R. No reply or closing memorandum may exceed 10 pages. ). ). ). ) )! Joes condition the alleged disability or conditions summary judgment or summary adjudication motion no. Not named as an individual in the FAC, he is only named his! Request to set aside the order, the request to set aside order!, 2021 cases in the same proceeding ). ). ). )..... Receivers cases. ). ). ). ). ). )..... Conscious disregard for the safety of others may constitute malice FDI-20-793239 ) ) as such, the Court sign.
Comfort Zone Diffuser Leaking, John King And Dana Bash Son, What Happened To Ryan From Texas Metal, Are Ichiro And Kurt Suzuki Related, Articles S